Numerical reasoning
10-18 questions · 75-90 seconds per question
What it tests. Financial data interpretation, mental arithmetic speed, and fractional and percentage analysis; filtering noise to isolate the needed variables.
Worked example. Given Q1-Q4 revenue and net margins for four DB subsidiaries in USD, EUR, GBP and JPY, if the EUR to USD rate strengthens 8% in Q2 and costs hold, what is the net USD impact on consolidated profit?
Common traps. The extraneous-data trap (reading the whole table instead of the prompt first) and the base-currency trap (missing a conversion or a Thousands/Millions axis label).
How to handle it. Set up a scratch-paper grid, write the formula before calculating, and use a dedicated physical calculator to avoid input lag.
Verbal reasoning
What it tests. Analytical reading comprehension and objective deduction, treating the text as the single source of truth and eliminating outside knowledge.
Worked example. A passage on the Global Hausbank strategy says North American operations are growing rapidly but gives no percentage; the statement that DB earns more than half its IB revenue there must be answered Cannot Say.
Common traps. Bringing outside knowledge, and confusing likely true with provably true.
How to handle it. Read the statement before the text to hunt keywords, and treat 'Cannot Say' as a fully viable answer rather than forcing True or False.
Logical / inductive / deductive reasoning
12-15 items · Roughly 75 seconds per item
What it tests. Abstract problem solving and fluid intelligence: spotting anomalies, mapping structures and tracing errors.
Common traps. The hyper-focus trap of solving the whole pattern at once when it changes along multiple vectors (position, color, size), and timer panic.
How to handle it. Isolate one variable at a time (for example rotation), eliminate options that violate that rule, then move to the next, reaching the answer in under 45 seconds.
Situational Judgment Test (SJT)
What it tests. Alignment with cultural compliance, ethical risk mitigation, collaborative communication and professional prioritization.
Worked example. With a pitchbook due at 8:00 AM and a director demanding urgent filings in an hour, the most effective option is to check the time required and immediately align with your associate on priority or find another analyst, not to escalate to the head of the division or refuse the director.
Common traps. The lone-ranger trap of fixing institutional bottlenecks alone, and the over-commercial trap of prioritizing revenue over compliance.
How to handle it. Align every answer with the firm values (integrity, sustainable performance, client centricity, innovation, discipline, partnership); never cut corners, hide a mistake or bypass compliance.
Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ32r)
What it tests. Behavioral traits and workplace preferences across relationships, thinking styles and emotions, with consistency checks across 100+ items.
Common traps. The inconsistency trap of gaming the test, which the engine flags as low consistency and can auto-reject, and extreme polarizing that tries to look 100% aggressive and 100% risk-averse at once.
How to handle it. Answer truthfully through a professional lens, favoring attention to detail, adherence to rules, structured thinking and collaboration, with absolute consistency.