J.P. Morgan · Online Assessment
J.P. Morgan screens candidates through Pymetrics (Harver), with HackerRank and SHL Verify G+ by track before any interview. Below: the exact format, what each section tests, and how to practise it in identical conditions until you walk in confident.
J.P. Morgan Pack
One-time payment. Yours for the whole application season.
Applying to several firms? The Season Pass is a yearly subscription covering every firm, $199 a year, cancel anytime.
The format
Within 24-72 hours of the application; for front-office tracks it gates or bundles with the HireVue before any human reads your resume.
Most online assessments split into 3-5 sections, each with its own clock. Speed and accuracy both count.
Modern formats get harder if you answer correctly, easier if you struggle. Your final score reflects what you can actually do under time pressure.
J.P. Morgan sets a pass mark per test type. Below it, you don't progress regardless of how strong the rest of your application is.
Completion window. 48-120 hours (2-5 calendar days); missing it is an automatic system rejection.
By division. Multi-vendor by division: Pymetrics + HireVue for IB/Markets/Corporate Banking, HackerRank for Software Engineering, SHL Verify G+ for some quantitative and operational tracks.
Recent changes. The gamified and video-centric approach has been stable for several cycles; the firm occasionally moves SJTs into the application portal but keeps the Pymetrics neuroscience benchmark for core banking roles.
The provider
J.P. Morgan configures its own selection of Pymetrics (Harver), with HackerRank and SHL Verify G+ by track modules. Below: the exact products in the suite, why they were chosen, and what the provider's reputation is across the candidate pool.
History at J.P. Morgan. A high-volume front-funnel screen benchmarked against a profile built from the firm's top-performing analysts.
Candidate reputation. Pymetrics is a "black box" - you see a trait report but never your compatibility score; SHL is the time-pressured psychometrics gold standard; HackerRank is respected but strict on runtime and space complexity.
Section breakdown
Each section has its own format, timer and trap pattern. Worked examples below show exactly what you will see and where candidates drop points.
~25-30 minutes total
What it tests. Risk tolerance, memory, attention, emotional recognition, processing speed and learning agility.
Common traps. Trying to act like an "ideal banker" creates an unnatural, inconsistent trait profile.
How to handle it. In the Balloon game cash out consistently at 4-6 pumps; in the Tower game pause 5-10 seconds to plan; in the Money Exchange game err toward fairness and collaboration.
~75-90 seconds per question
What it tests. Data interpretation, ratio analysis, percentage change and isolating relevant variables from noise.
Common traps. Distractor variables and unit/currency mismatches forcing an unseen conversion step.
How to handle it. Read the prompt first, locate only the metrics you need, and keep a clean scratchpad.
Strict per-question
What it tests. Deductive logic, comprehension and suppressing outside assumptions.
Common traps. The real-world-knowledge trap and stretching "some/often" into "all/always".
How to handle it. Treat the passage as the only universe of facts; if it is not supported, the answer is Cannot Say.
Strict
What it tests. Abstract reasoning, pattern recognition and rule induction.
Common traps. Fixating on one variable while missing a simultaneous rule (e.g., rotation plus a count increment).
How to handle it. Scan a checklist each step: shape, shading, orientation, element count, position.
What it tests. Professional judgment, escalation awareness and prioritization.
Common traps. The "hero" fallacy (solving a major error alone) and the passive bystander.
How to handle it. Filter every option through the firm principles: protect client data, escalate compliance risk, communicate transparently.
60 minutes
What it tests. Algorithmic logic, Big-O efficiency and edge-case validation.
Common traps. A brute-force O(n^2) solution that passes visible cases but times out on hidden ones.
How to handle it. Write optimal, modular code and pass every hidden edge case (empty inputs, negatives, overflow).
Pass mark
Entirely algorithmic and benchmarked: your trait profile is cross-referenced against a proprietary target built from the firm's top analysts and associates.
Methodology. One bad section can sink you: a single trait mismatch (e.g., flagged highly impulsive for an IB seat) or a failed HackerRank problem causes an automated rejection.
Response time. Scoring is near-instant; human review of the package takes a few days to several weeks.
Score visibility. You never see your numerical score or compatibility ranking; the Pymetrics trait report indicates nothing about pass/fail.
How to practise
Same provider, same section structure, same time pressure. With a scored report after every test so you can fix the weakest section before the real one.
Free practice section, scored. Full report unlocks with the Pack.
Why candidates fail
Specific failure patterns documented across past applicants. Most are avoidable with structured preparation.
Analysis paralysis on numerical items
Spending three minutes on one hard math question leaves no time for the final questions.
Over-engineering the Pymetrics persona
Deliberately clicking faster or slower disrupts your genuine patterns and flags inconsistency.
Failing hidden HackerRank cases
A brute-force solution that works on examples but fails on hidden scale or edge cases is an auto-reject.
Treating the SJT as a personal opinion poll
Answering as you would with a roommate, not by the firm's compliance and team-first protocols.
What works
Concrete habits drilled by candidates who clear the cut-off, drawn from applicant accounts and practice patterns.
Precision scratchpad setup
Keep a clean, structured layout with pre-set ratios so multi-step math never requires rewriting data.
Reverse-engineer profile alignment
Match game-play to your division: IB rewards planning and disciplined risk; trading rewards processing speed.
Strategic pre-move pausing
In the Tower game, pause 5-10 seconds to map the full move sequence before the first click.
Production-grade HackerRank code
Write optimal O(n) or O(n log n) algorithms with clean names from the start, not a refactor under the clock.
From past applicants
Anonymised candidate accounts of how recent applicants approached the J.P. Morgan assessment. Each covers the prep, the experience, and the outcome.
Investment Banking, Summer Analyst (target Ivy)
Prep. After being rejected everywhere freshman year, prepared the Pymetrics carefully this time.
Experience. The standard Pymetrics suite bundled with HireVue. Paused ~8 seconds to plan each Tower level and cashed out at 4-5 pumps on the Balloon game to show steady, controlled risk.
Outcome. Cleared the assessment, got the HireVue immediately, and eventually an offer.
Software Engineering Program, large non-target
Prep. Focused on the HackerRank score, the dominant factor for non-targets.
Experience. Two questions in 60 minutes: a two-pointer array problem and a sliding-window problem with a negative-integer edge case. The first attempt timed out on 3 hidden cases; refactored with a hash map to O(n) and passed all 15.
Outcome. Advanced to the resume screen and the Code for Good hackathon stage.
Practice strategy
Practice with materials that mimic the exact format and constraints of each provider you will face.
Pymetrics simulators (JobTestPrep, Graduates First)
Mirror the 12 games and give feedback on planning times, risk profile and attention so you can adjust before the real test.
SHL Direct + timed drills
Get comfortable with the interactive interface and drill data extraction and ratio math under the clock.
LeetCode (J.P. Morgan tag)
Arrays, strings, two-pointer, hash maps and basic stack/queue at Easy/Medium difficulty for HackerRank.
Time investment. 10-15 hours for finance/operational tracks; 30-40 hours of algorithmic problem sets for technical tracks.
Time management
FAQ
It is multi-vendor by division. Front-office tracks (Investment Banking, Markets, Asset Management, Commercial Banking) use the Pymetrics (Harver) 12-game behavioral assessment paired with HireVue, often with an embedded situational judgment test. The Software Engineering Program uses a 60-minute, two-question HackerRank coding challenge. Some quantitative and operational tracks use SHL Verify G+ Interactive for numerical, inductive and deductive reasoning. Practice for the specific provider your division uses.
The other rounds
Online Assessment is one of four rounds. The Pack covers all four end to end.
J.P. Morgan Pack
Practise the exact Pymetrics (Harver), with HackerRank and SHL Verify G+ by track format ahead of time, scored against the J.P. Morgan pass mark. One Pack covers HireVue, online assessments, live interviews and the superday.
Get the J.P. Morgan Pack · $89Intervyo is not affiliated with or endorsed by J.P. Morgan, SHL, Pymetrics, Cubiks, AON or any other assessment provider. Test details are sourced from past applicants and published guidance; verify on the firm's careers site before applying. Sector: Investment Banking.
J.P. Morgan Pack
$89 one-time