Numerical reasoning
12-18 questions · 17-25 minutes
What it tests. Quantitative data synthesis, mental arithmetic agility, and filtering out irrelevant noise in financial layouts (~75 seconds per question).
Worked example. If APAC operating expenses rise 8.5% while revenue drops 2%, what is the new net profit margin?
Common traps. Misreading axis units (000s vs Ms) and selecting an answer off by a factor of 10 or 100; distractor options built from common mistakes.
How to handle it. Use a clean gridded scratchpad and a physical calculator; instantly recall percentage-change and margin formulas.
Verbal reasoning
~30 questions · 19 minutes (under 40 seconds each)
What it tests. Formal deductive logic and comprehension under extreme time pressure; separating verified text facts from outside knowledge.
Worked example. A passage on PwC piloting generative AI for tax audits, with a statement to judge True/False/Cannot Say.
Common traps. Bringing in outside knowledge; over-interpreting absolute words ("all", "never") versus probabilistic qualifiers.
How to handle it. Read the statements first to scan for keywords; keep a strict literal mindset and mark Cannot Say when unsupported.
Logical / inductive / deductive reasoning
~18 questions · ~18 minutes
What it tests. Fluid intelligence, spatial orientation and simultaneous rule management under pressure.
Worked example. A 3x3 grid where shapes change color, rotate and gain sides; choose the missing figure.
Common traps. Fixating on one variable and missing a second rule; getting stuck on one pattern and burning three minutes.
How to handle it. Use the M.O.V.E.S. framework (Movement, Orientation, Value/number, Exterior/Interior, Shading); guess and flag after 45 seconds.
Situational Judgment Test (SJT)
Untimed (~20-30 minutes by design)
What it tests. Practical workplace intelligence aligned with the five PwC Professional dimensions.
Worked example. A senior associate tells you to copy forward last year's testing without fresh verification on a minor line item.
Common traps. The extreme confrontational option (reporting straight to the partner) or the passive do-nothing option.
How to handle it. Filter every answer through the PwC Professional framework: quality, accuracy and integrity override timeline pressure; prefer structured, constructive problem-solving with your immediate supervisor.
Personality questionnaire (OPQ32)
Untimed
What it tests. Workplace behavioral preferences across 32 traits, mapped for fit with PwC culture.
Worked example. From "I enjoy taking charge", "I look for errors in detailed reports", "I keep the team harmonious", pick most and least like you.
Common traps. Trying to answer as a perfect consultant (consistency checks flag social-desirability bias); shifting preferences across blocks.
How to handle it. Answer as your professional self; balance attention to detail, organization and teamwork with leadership initiative.